• Online Retailers Give Thanks

    Holiday spending is expected in increase by almost 5% this year, which is a rather robust rate, and this is certainly great news for retailers. But almost all of that growth is expected to be online, and so brick-and-mortar brands have been busily building their online platforms over the past few years. The ones who haven't done so might not survive to see the next Christmas. But now that the biggest shopping weekend of the year (loosely known as "Black Friday") has come and gone, how do things look for holiday retail sales so far?

    Image result for holiday shopping online

    More than 70% of U.S. adults shopped over the holiday weekend--increasingly online rather than in-person--which is 174 million people. Wow. This is a staggering number, and now that most sales promotions are spread out over several days in some cases weeks, the sense of urgency as well as the unruly crowds are largely becoming things of the past. Even more staggering is the fact that the average shopper spent a whopping $335, suggesting that people are still doing a significant amount of their holiday shopping on this important weekend despite the fact that promotions happen throughout the months of October, November, and December. Indeed "CyberMonday" was the single largest internet shopping day in American history with $6.6 billion spent online. The economy is firing on all cylinders right now with strong GDP and low unemployment, and so online retailers are giving thanks for last weekend and have every reason to expect that they will enjoy a very merry Christmas indeed. Sears and JC Penney's? Not so much.

    Discussion: Do you think this holiday spending trend will continue and the revenue projection will be reached? Defend your assertions.

  • 100 Years Of "Gift Dressing"

    What do World War One and Christmas have in common? Gift wrapping was invented back in 1917, but back then it was called " gift dressing", which actually makes a whole bunch of sense. Kansas City-based Hallmark Cards Inc., a brand that is still a major player in the gift market as well as a niche player in television content and distribution (the Hallmark Channel), takes credit for launching the American trend as an attractive alternative to using brown packaging paper or newspapers as wrapping, which was a common practice back in the The Day. Using newspaper was also common practice for me when I was in college, much to my mother's disapproval.

    Image result for hallmark christmas wrapping vintage

    Hallmark and other retailers at the time already sold green, red, and white tissue paper, and some of this paper even sported wreath and holly designs, but in 1917 the company ran out of tissue paper right before Christmas Day. As a result, the marketing-minded older brother of Hallmark founder Joyce Hall had the idea of selling colored envelope liners for a dime each. They sold out.

    Image result for hallmark gift wrapping

    The company then began manufacturing and selling its own gift wrap products, which represented Hallmark's first brand extension beyond the highly successful greeting card line. The 1930's and the Great Depression saw ribbon on store shelves for the first time and later on bows. Hallmark began offering gift wrapping workshops in the 1950's and 60's as the trend became a tradition, and they even produced instructional videos. Traditional holiday colors made room for bright non-traditional holiday colors in the 1960's. Gift bags were added as recently as 1987 and then shortly after that, a pocket was added for the card, which was getting lost in the bag itself. There is a subtle genius in all of this simple marketing, isn't there? Since e-cards basically stink overall (nothing says you don't care quite like an e-card can), we here at KnowNow! Marketing wonder what will be next?

    Discussion: What do you think the future holds for gift wrapping and for brands like Hallmark? How much of a threat has the Internet posed to the traditional greeting card market over the past several years? What can Hallmark and others do to remain relevant to a new generation of gift givers?

  • Short On X-Mas Trees

    Although the Great Recession has been over for many years now, some aftereffects can still be felt in certain industries. Let's take Christmas trees as an example. Apparently there is a shortage this year, but what does that have to do with the recession? Indeed the economic environment is an extremely important variable for marketers to consider when making Marketing Mix decisions. The economy affects spending in many ways, but it also affects what happens further up the supply chain.

    Image result for christmas tree farms

    It takes about 10 years to grow a ready-for-market tree in the Pacific Northwest, an important region as far as the overall supply of Christmas trees is concerned. At the height of the recession, retailers were paying just $12 for a tree that cost farmers $16 to grow. This is how desperate companies were to sell their inventories. But this year, retailers are paying as much as $40 for a premium tree, which has resulted great margins for growers, but also bidding wars among retailers to get the best quality trees for resale. All of this means somewhat higher prices for consumers, but it also means that smaller retailers are less able to compete with the larger retailers who can afford to absorb lower profit margins on the trees. It's a bit of a mess.

    Image result for christmas tree lots

    But smart marketers can plan for this sort of thing. A drought, for example, eventually affects the price of all kinds of crops as well as livestock that need feed, and farmers know how these cycles work. In this particular case, both growers and retailers knew that supply was falling during the recession, and they also know how long it takes to grow a tree. This is pretty much all the information one would need to adjust strategy to meet new conditions in the external marketing environment. Of course sales forecasting is predicated on having information like this, and as long as demand remains relatively predictable, figuring out the supply side should not be too much of an issue. But in this case, some small retailers were caught by surprise, and so in the spirit of this, KnowNow! Marketing would like to remind everyone that marketers must make contingency plans for fluctuations in the supply of raw materials. And this particular case really shouldn't have been much of a surprise.

  • Amazon's Clicks and Bricks

    Amazon is ready for the holidays. And as it stands today, the company has been both naughty and nice. It has been naughty to its competitors who are finding it increasingly hard to compete and it has been nice to its consumers who can now shop Amazon through multiple channels.

     Image result for amazon stores images

    Indeed the massive retailer has been busy opening up brick-and-mortar retail locations across the country, giving marketers even more opportunities to sell its Kindle e-readers, tablets and other ubiquitous gadgets. The Amazon Books format sells toys, electronics, gifts and other products. Amazon now sells gadgets in more than 100 Whole Foods Markets. Kohl's has allocated "store-within-a-store" space in 10 of its department stores and there may be more on the way. And Amazon now has small mall-format shops in several regional malls. This is all in addition to its Amazon Go stores which are opening up across the nation.

    Image result for amazon stores images

    What is interesting is that Amazon is increasing its physical presence in a big way amidst a massive shift of consumer spending towards e-commerce. This suggests that brick-and-mortar retail, after a culling of perhaps 20% of existing locations (there are far too many stores), will be alive and well in the future. The most successful stores will offer seamless e-commerce and in-store experiences, with Amazon and Wal-Mart leading the way. There will always be plenty of room for boutique and specialty retailers, and surviving malls will have to be true destination spots rather than bland collections of the same old stores. The economy is performing better than it has in the past decade, and consumer spending has been brisk this year. Indeed there are a number of "zombie retailers" still stumbling about, and these brands will eventually cease to exist. But for the healthier retailers, this should be a very good holiday season.

    Discussion: How do you feel about the future of retail? What other brands might emerge to challenge Amazon and Wal-Mart?

  • Facebook's Facts

    Facebook and Google handle about 80% of the advertising that exists online, and this duopoly certainly isn't good news for online advertisers. And Facebook became even more dominant this year with a 79% leap in third quarter profit. That's quite a revenue model Mr. Zuckerberg has developed and kudos to him for doing so much in so little time.

    Image result for mr zuckerberg

    But after much ballyhoo about hacking, Russians buying political ads, fake ad traffic, questions about ad effectiveness, complaints about the company's power and influence, as well as other issues that have culminated in a Congressional investigation, the company has decided to improve its image by saying that it will forgo a modicum of future growth and profits in the name of improving the security and safety of its product.

    Image result for russian ad buying

    And three cheers for that. The fix involves hiring thousands of security specialists to re-engineer certain functions as well as constructing new artificial intelligence systems to weed out "bad actors". Mr. Zuckerberg has said that he is "dead serious" about these efforts, and this is all certain to generate some positive publicity for Facebook among its many stakeholders. It does appear that marketers there are facing some new facts regarding the political and regulatory environment, and they are smartly adjusting strategy to meet these external threats.

    Discussion: Are you concerned about Facebook's power and influence? In what ways, if any, should the government intervene?

  • Clubs Seek Gen X For Growth

    As the oldest Millennials settle into middle age, growth in the $24 billion "club" industry has begun to slow down. And while most clubs are focusing on the youngest Millennials and the emerging age cohort just now entering college, some savvy marketers have discovered that there is considerable opportunity among an older, albeit smaller demographic--Generation X.

    Image result for generation x

    The 45-54 age group spends more on entertainment than anyone and, as such, comprise the biggest share of consumers at bars and nightclubs that serve food. Smaller spaces, bottle service, unique cocktails, and 70's/80's dance music are on the menu at many places across the country. In some cases, marketers attract these older customers with dinner and try to keep them in the venue throughout the night, which for many of us in this age-group is probably around 11. It appears that opportunities abound in this and other industries to position products and target yet another generation that is redefining what it means to age gracefully.

    Discussion: What other industries might be overlooking the middle-aged Generation X age cohort (ages 37-53)?

  • Coffee vs. Tea

    In previous posts, we have established that the market for coffee retailers is absolutely saturated and that smaller stores are now experiencing declines while even the growth rate at Starbucks has slowed considerably. But even when there are too many shops, most can be supported by a growing market, and so it begs the question, "How is coffee doing these days?"

    Image result for coffee versus tea

    On a global level, tea is still the dominant beverage by volume, with drinkers consuming 1.7 trillion cups of the stuff last year versus 984 billion cups of coffee. That's a significant difference. But these tea numbers are juiced by the presence of heavy tea drinkers in China and India, where a hefty percentage of the world's population resides, and where the tea is fairly inexpensive. In the U.S., the number of cups of tea consumed has climbed by 6.5% since 2012 and at the same time tea sales have increased by almost 10%. This means that Americans are drinking pricier tea despite the demise of Teavana, a high end Starbucks concept that failed this year. Perhaps that concept was a bit ahead of its time. But globally, coffee makers and retailers have performed surprisingly better than have the tea people. The coffee industry represents $79 billion in sales compared with $42.7 billion for tea, which means that consumers have been drinking some pretty expensive coffee.

    Image result for specialty tea stores

    Tea makers, for their part, have been ramping up marketing efforts to make the tea bag a bit more appealing to consumers by adding specialty ingredients and premium packaging. But some marketers, believing that the tea bag itself might be a barrier to consumer adoption, are offering alternatives to the traditional bag with European consumer products giant, Unilever, offering tea products in capsule form. And retailers such as Peet's, with its Matcha Green Tea and Dirty Chai lattes, are now offering more coffee-esque tea drinks in hopes that they can diversify their product offerings and be on the forefront of an emerging trend. Will consumers pay more for tea as they have done for coffee over the past 50 years? Indeed it remains to be seen just how much of this is wishful marketing and how much of it reflects changing consumer attitudes.

    Discussion: Do you think that specialty tea can overtake coffee in terms revenue? How are "substitutes" such as energy drinks affecting the coffee and tea industries at the present time?

  • The Magic Age? 26

    For marketers, young shoppers have always been a coveted demographic, and since this generation is the largest in history, targeting and attracting those in their 20's and 30's has become the key to the survival of many brands. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, the biggest single age cohort at the present time is 26 years of age (24, 25, and 27 are not far behind); and so, one might expect that all sorts of marketing messages would be targeted to this group.

    Image result for millennials

    This 26 age cohort numbers almost 5 million people, and although many of these young adults have been voting for a couple of election cycles, a significant number still live at home with parents and therefore still aren't making many of the major purchasing decision most of us would consider to be milestones of adulthood. In fact, parents are now able to keep their kids on their insurance through age 26. But now, many of these folks are on the verge of very important life decisions including those involving skills attainment, industry/profession selection, geographic preference, personal relationship building, having kids, buying homes, etc. And so marketers are addressing this market segment with much enthusiasm.

    Image result for millennials

    They had better move quickly because this group is aging, and the next generation of U.S. consumers after the Millennials (currently known as Generation Z or "iGen") are the children of the much smaller Generation X and therefore comprise a smaller cohort. Indeed young people today are making what most would consider to be "adult" decisions a bit later in life than did their predecessors, and so marketers have had to take this into consideration over the past 10 years. For many people in their mid-20's, parents are still making most purchasing decisions in the household. But this bunch is finally getting too old to live at home, and so marketers are excited at the prospect of penetrating this massive group of budding consumers. It will certainly be interesting to see how these marketers intend to address this important market.

  • Coffee Crunch?

    A quick look around any downtown area will tell you that coffee retailers, led by the far-too-ubiquitous Starbucks, have saturated the market with their shops. To say this market isn't crowded is to ignore the fact that "specialty coffee" can now be found not only at McDonald's, but also at many gas stations. It's everywhere, and that means that the industry is due for a shakeout.

    Image result for coffee shops too many stores

    There are now almost 33,000 coffee shops in the U.S., which is a 16% increase from only five years ago, a time when the market appeared to be rather saturated already. Traffic growth at large chains like Starbucks has been slowing (but still growing), while traffic in the mid-size and smaller stores is actually declining. But prices have not really declined as much as they usually do in a hypercompetitive marketplace. In fact, Starbucks, which controls over 40% of the shops in the U.S. has been busily raising its prices while also trying to find new ways to sell non-coffee related goods to its customers. But marketers there know quite well that the industry has matured.

    Image result for coffee shops too many

    Readers of KnowNOW! Marketing realize that retail is already a crowded sector overall, and we have been calling for a reckoning (which has still eluded us) for quite some time now. Solid economic growth has helped some of these "zombie retailers" like Sears and Radio Shack remain ambulatory, but soon another great culling of the weaker players should commence. Profit margins are thinning as industry prices begin to fall, but smaller retailers are unable to generate adequate velocity to compensate for these lower margins, and some of these players will begin to close shop. Perhaps even Starbucks will eventually have to lower its prices. Much depends on the consumer demand for coffee, which will be the subject of a future post.

    Discussion: Can you name four major competitors to Starbucks (without looking on the Internet)? Now look on the Internet and find four competitors. Which of these brands is best positioned for the future? Which has the weakest position. Defend your answers.

  • No New Malls?

    The age of the enclosed regional mall has long been over with construction peaking in the late 1980's, a trend that began well before the age of e-commerce. This is not to say that they will disappear altogether, but only six large malls were built in the U.S. between 2006 and 2015. By comparison, a total of 54 were built during the previous decade, which means that the trajectory is clearly trending towards extinction. But has the impending the death of the shopping mall been greatly exaggerated?

    Image result for demolished malls

    Methinks, yes. Places that consolidate different retailer brands (malls) will always be around, and new construction will always be favored over old facilities. And despite the fact that only one major mall is currently under construction in the U.S., it is highly unlikely that the "mall" concept will die out entirely. Rather, many smaller, multi-use developments continue to open, especially in areas undergoing gentrification. New shopping centers are still emerging, and old locations continue to be demolished to make way for the new. It does appear that the mega-mall's final days are indeed upon us, but smaller format retail projects are still alive and well. For certain, there are far too many brick-and-mortar locations right now, and several struggling brands will disappear over the next few years. But a quick look at Amazon's recent foray into opening physical locations tells us all we need to know. Brick and mortar is alive and well.

    Discussion: What percentage of retail sales are e-commerce versus brick-and-mortar? What is the e-commerce growth rate? Why do you think Amazon is opening physical locations?

  • Save Less, Spend More...For Now

    Saving less and spending more appears to be the preferred state of being for the average U.S. consumer in 2017, and this could be a large reason why recent economic growth has been better than in recent years. Big ticket items like automobiles and household appliances appear to be driving the trend, possibly due to some pent up demand for these sorts of items, but since income growth has been modest at best, one wonders where all the money is coming from. And now we know.

    Image result for consumer spending

    The savings rate fell to a 10-year low of 3.1%, down significantly from as high as 6.3% in late 2015. While this is great for marketers in the short run, eventually the savings rate will have to rise again, and without growth in GDP and income, these same consumers will eventually have to pull back. This means that marketers have only a short window to take advantage of this short-term shopping spree, but take advantage of it they can.

    Image result for consumer spending

    The good news is that a pending reduction in the business tax rate (currently the highest in the entire developed world) will give companies more flexibility to hire and give pay raises, which should raise GDP. Higher economic growth means that when consumers do raise their rate of saving, they would have more money to spend due to higher GDP, and so they could continue spending.

    Image result for consumer spending

    Of course without a reduction in the size of government, our national debt will rise as tax rates fall despite GDP growth, but that is another problem altogether. The point here is that economic growth and spending are closely related, and that lower taxes rates combined with higher incomes mean that both businesses and consumers will have more money to spend. If tax rates remain the same or for some reason increase, it is highly unlikely that we will be able achieve the economic growth necessary to overcome the effect of consumers scaling back their spending and increasing their rate of saving. Marketers should be rooting for lower taxes. And right now, the political environment is heating up on this very subject. Let's see what happens.

    Discussion: In what other ways can the economic environment influence marketing decisions? What can government do (or not do) to help foster a healthier economic environment?

  • Bridge? Not a Sport

    In my Sports Marketing class, we often have a brief debate as to what and what should not constitute a "sport". To what degree should competition be a factor? If it is a factor then what about Jogging? Should physical exertion be a factor? How much physical exertion? Does Curling or Auto Racing count? Why does ESPN broadcast Spelling Bees and Hot Dog Eating Contests?

    Image result for hot dog eating contests

    Of course, this discussion is brief because it merely serves to illustrate the lack of agreement as to what "sport" really is, which is why it was so interesting to see the card game, Bridge, at the center of the controversy in Europe. Indeed it is a game of strategy and skill, one that few people (almost none of them under 50) even know how to play. Tournaments are held every year around the world. People are serious about this game. But is it really a sport?

    Image result for bridge the card game

    Last week, a European Court of Justice ruled that competitive Bridge couldn't be considered a sport because it lacks a "significant physical element". The whole thing arose from a tax dispute exemption that people over there get for engaging in activities that promote physical and mental well-being, with bridge ultimately failing to qualify for the exemption. The decision makes it clear that activities that promote only mental well-being do not count as "sports", which is academic to those of us in my classroom, but a very important distinction when money is involved. And so sport must be physical, but the word "significant" is still rather open to interpretation, so don't expect the overall argument as to what is and what is not a "sport" to be settled any time soon.

  • The Truth About Innovation: Part Three

    Continued From Part Two

    By now, the point of this three-part article should be abundantly clear. We in industry have overused the term “innovation”, and are therefore somewhat desensitized to technological and product developments. Consumers barely even notice most of what we accomplish due to the continuous nature of our innovations.  Here is the rub.

    Image result for the rub 

    New product development in our sector is really driven by needs and wants in the marketplace, not technology. This is known as the “Marketing Concept”, the dominant strategic approach in contemporary marketing, wherein marketers identify a need in the marketplace and deliver a bundle of features and benefits (a product) that addresses that need. Technological advancements are fine, but generally result in barely noticeable, incremental innovation. This means that product development is primarily under the purview of marketers since these professionals are responsible for assessing consumer needs. Research and development then follows the lead of marketing to insure that what those folks are developing has a relevant market application and is something consumers actually want. Many firms learn this simple lesson too late and expend massive resources pushing something that doesn’t resonate in the marketplace.

     Image result for the marketplace

    Unfortunately, this is often lost on most industry people who have never taken business classes, but it is very basic science to those of us who have. We learn that new products (which fail 80-90% of the time) should be need-driven in almost all cases (excepting the area of needs consumers didn’t know they had in the first place, which is rare). The firm’s job is to address, and in many cases exceed, expectations in meeting the market need while differentiating their offerings from competitive and substitute products. This attempt at differentiation generally results in a whole heck of a lot of non-innovation, some continuous innovation, and an occasional dynamically continuous innovation, but rarely does it result in something that disrupts the industry.

     Image result for same old same old

    Nevertheless marketers and media alike will continue to push “the next big thing” as manufacturers look for the next big ingredient and retailers tailor their product mix to meet the demands of their customer base. I will take the road less traveled and remind everyone that new market applications are what spawns innovation in the personal care world, and not necessarily a new ingredient that meets an existing need. So let’s dispense with the hype and begin talking about ingredients and products in terms of how consumers view them rather than “innovations” that do not matter to the marketplace. Indeed market applications are crucial to justifying the use of certain ingredients as well as the development and commercialization of the products themselves. May The Marketing Concept Be With You.

    Discussion: How do you use the term "innovation"? Does Apple have some products that are "more innovative" than other? Explain.

  • The Truth About Innovation: Part Two

    Continued from Part One

    Product Development is one of my favorite university courses to teach, and this important class we learn that there are three forms of innovation.

    1. A continuous innovation describes a new product that requires almost no change in consumer behavior, and so it represents very minor changes in an existing product type. An example of this would be an existing hand lotion product that features a new non-active ingredient, or if you prefer a technological example, each iteration of the iPhone would be continuous. Many experts do not consider a continuous innovation to be very innovative at all.
    2. A dynamically continuous innovation involves a major change in a minor behavior or a minor change in a major behavior. An example would be a hand lotion (either an existing product or a new one) that features an entirely new way of dispensing the liquid such as moving from a jar to a pump. Or technologically speaking, it’s the difference between a tablet and a laptop.
    3. A discontinuous innovation can be very disruptive to the industry. An example in personal care would be a product (or a newly discovered ingredient) that has an entirely new market application such as hair regrowth. The decade-old advent of skin and hair care products in the form of ingestible nutritional supplements may have been the last true discontinuous innovation in our sector. In tech terms, the inventions mentioned earlier in the article would qualify as discontinuous innovations.

    Image result for innovate products

    In most cases, it’s not really the ingredients that are innovative, but the finished product. And in every case, it is always the degree of consumer behavioral change required, and not the ingredient/product itself, that determines the type of innovation. It may sound academic, but what happens is that people in general become desensitized to words that they hear all the time such as “innovative, and when they are underwhelmed by what they see, it serves to further numb the target market to the marketing message. And I think we can all agree now that the vast majority of new products are continuous innovations. The real ground-breaking product, featuring an entirely new ingredient with an entirely new application, can only be introduced once. After that, successive products will be dynamically continuous or continuous innovations. As such, in almost all cases, “hot” ingredients are merely popular, and not really innovative.

    Image result for innovate products 

    Now let’s look at the patent process. In order to qualify for a patent in the U.S., an invention must be novel, involve an inventive step not obvious to a skilled person, and have an industrial application. If approved, the patent is exclusive for 20 years. Patents are awarded in personal care all of the time, mostly in the form of process and composition of matter inventions, but the vast majority of these do not require changes in consumer behavior, and so they cannot be considered innovations in any respect, and in too many cases the changes are things the consumer doesn’t even notice.

    To Be Continued in Part Three

  • The Truth About Innovation: Part One

    Natural ingredients come from everywhere, and many of them have multiple applications that meet a broad assortment of consumer needs. Every year there are a handful of popular ingredients that dominate new product development, and each year the list changes slightly. Natural ingredients are rather like fashion, and as they say on TV’s Project Runway, one day you are in and the next you are out. A Google search of the “New Natural Personal Care Ingredients” revealed a bunch of patented and branded ingredient combinations addressing existing needs as well as lists of ingredients to avoid, and the most popular ingredients. When the word “new” was replaced by “innovative” the list was largely the same.

    Image result for innovation

    But just because some of these ingredients are relatively new, does that make them “innovative”?  It seems that this word has been thrown around quite a bit and has lost much of its meaning, similar to the way that social media, and Facebook in particular, has somewhat diluted the word “friend”.  And this begs the question, “Are ingredients truly innovative or is this just a bedtime story that product developers tell themselves so that they have a better reason to rise and shine in the morning?” It may very well be true that just because a new botanical or ingredient blend is new or popular, this doesn’t necessarily mean that it is innovative in any real sense. Let us explore this rather controversial assertion further.

    Image result for innovation

    The term “innovation” has been used to describe all kinds of underwhelming product developments, and the colloquial understanding of the term is that it means “new”. I think we can all agree that the telegraph, automobile, light bulb, radio, television, computer and smartphone were all ground-breaking innovations, but what about each iteration of the iPhone? Is a new emollient truly innovative? A new natural preservative? A new, naturally-derived active ingredient? What do you think?

    To Be Continued in "Part Two"


  • Gucci Grabs Young Shoppers

    With all of the talk about how the vast majority of traditional brands are struggling mightily to resonate with a massive cohort of fickle young consumers, it's nice to see one of your grandmother's classic brands emerge as a winner in bridging the proverbial "generational gap". Indeed we are talking about Gucci.

    Image result for gucci and young consumers

    Yes, Gucci. Apparently, Millennials love Gucci, and so marketers at Gucci are learning to love Millennials replete with the incredible purchasing power that the largest generation in the history of the world is just now beginning to wield. Sales at Gucci are up by almost 50% from last year and half of those sales were to consumers under the age of 35. Success has been driven largely by a complete change in the product mix with a new look consisting of a wide range of colors, patterns and periods. Variety. The spice in the diet of almost every Millennial.

    Image result for gucci and young consumers

    The "New Gucci" is also improving customer retention, with a robust digital marketing platform that enables the brand to develop and maintain a one-to-one relationship with any consumer that wants one. But today's fashion consumer is more fickle than ever, and so the marketers at Gucci will have to stay connected to what their consumers really want in addition to offering riskier, fashion-forward products that might set it apart from competitive brands. So far so good for Gucci.

    Discussion: Name another "classic" brand that is resonating with young consumers. What is it about the brand that is appealing?

  • Friday Night Lights Dimming

    As a sport, American football has lots of problems. The NFL's foibles have been well-documented here at KnowNOW! Marketing, and we all know that the CTE brain injury issue is gaining steam as more evidence mounts that significant numbers of former players have the irreversible disease that is caused by head trauma. Of the two problems, the CTE issue is by far the one that poses the greatest long-term threat to the health of the sport and the billions upon billions of dollars it generates. The NFL might be losing viewers, but football is losing participants.

    Image result for CTE

    A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Colorado found that high school football participation actually peaked back in 2009 and has dropped each year since then. This was well before CTE became a well-known issue, and so there are probably other factors at play in why there are fewer players. The bad news is that there will be less talent in the future as a result and thus a lower quality product at both the collegiate and professional levels. The good news is that flag football participation is actually on the increase, which means that as those leagues become more available to young people, perhaps the slide in football interest overall can be abated.

    Image result for american football youth players

    Since marketers know that people who participate in a particular sport are more likely than the general population to consume that sport as a spectator, it would follow that seeing participation rise at any level is good news--even flag football. And since CTE is now a reality, perhaps flag football is part of the sport's future even on a spectator level. That's hard for many football fans to swallow, and it would surely take a couple of decades for any meaningful changes to take place, if indeed they do take place. But it is hard to ignore shifts in the socio-cultural environment. Changes in attitudes often lead to changes in behaviors, and it's always best if marketers follow a trend from its inception rather than reacting to it much later on in the game.

    Image result for flag football

    Perhaps those with a vested financial interest in the game should band together, find out what the current perceptions are through some exhaustive marketing research, and develop a concerted plan to deal with the issue. The "Milk Mustache/Got Milk?" campaigns immediately come to mind. Maybe it's time for the great football minds of our time to take a cue from the dairy industry and work together to raise the entire category. Ignoring a problem means you fail to address it.

    Discussion:  Do you believe football is in crisis? Why or why not? What would you do to increase youth participation?