Browse by Tags

KnowNOW!

Global Economic Watch

Syndication

Recent Posts

Tags

Archives

  • Pew Report on Young Workers: 'Young, Underemployed and Optimistic Coming of Age, Slowly, in a Tough Economy'

    If you hear young adults complaining about how tough it is to find fulfilling, long term employment, you may be tempted to think they are just feeling sorry for themselves. After all, times are tough on everyone, right? Well, yes and no. Times may be tough across all age groups, and yet most Americans, and most economists, agree that young workers have it particularly bad these days. According to a new report from the Pew Research Center , "There seems to be a near consensus among the public that today’s young adults face greater challenges than their parents did in reaching some of the most basic economic benchmarks." The report shares some details on how young adults have reacted to the economic downturn: Many young adults have felt the impact of the recession and sluggish recovery in tangible ways. Fully half (49%) of those ages 18 to 34 say that because of economic conditions over the past few years, they have taken a job they didn’t really want just to pay the bills. More than a third (35%) say they have gone back to school because of the bad economy. And one-in-four (24%) say they have taken an unpaid job to gain work experience. For some, tough economic times have had an impact on their personal life as well. Roughly a quarter of adults ages 18 to 34 (24%) say that, due to economic conditions, they have moved back in with their parents in recent years after living on their own. Among those ages 25 to 29, the share moving back home rises to 34%. Most adults under age 25 are enrolled in school at least part time (46% are full-time students). By age 25, the majority are out of school, but jobs and housing can be hard to come by, and many “boomerang” back home. And yet, they remain largely optimistic about their future. Take a look: Read the full report here .
  • Unemployment Rate now 8.3%

    The unemployment rate continues to edge downward. The US economy added 243,000 jobs in January, dropping the unemployment rate to 8.3 percent, according to the Department of Labor . The private sector added 257,000 jobs during the month. Here's a look at the unemployment trends from the Bureau of Labor Statistics : Here are some of the key data from other areas we like to track in the monthly jobs report: The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons, at 8.2 million, changed little in January. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. In January, 2.8 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, essentially unchanged from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. Among the marginally attached, there were 1.1 million discouraged workers in January, little different from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.7 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in January had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. Read the full report from the BLS here .
  • OECD's Better Life Initiative and Moving Beyond GDP

    Last year, the OECD launched a new initiative with the aim of moving beyond GDP as the key measurement of a nation's economic strength. The Better Life Initiative is designed to come up with new ways of evaluating the overall economic health of a nation and its citizens. OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría narrates a short video to describe the progress of the initiative over the last 6 months: The OECD now has an interactive chart that allows you to see where member countries rank in various categories: Read more about the Better Life Initiative here .
  • SF Fed: A Closer Look at Unemployment Duration

    In a new Economic Letter for the San Francisco Fed , Rob Valletta and Katherine Kuang take a look at unemployment duration, which has been much longer following the Great Recession than following previous recessions. Factors like the changing demographics of the workforce (age, mainly), and the extension of unemployment benefits may be factors, but the authors note that they have had only a small impact: The limited impact of workforce characteristics and extended UI suggests that other factors bear primary responsibility for the recent spike in unemployment duration. The most obvious one is the severity and persistence of employment losses compared with past recessions. Figure 2 shows employment patterns during and after the last four U.S. recessions, in each case measured relative to the pre-recession employment peak. At the recent employment trough in early 2010, employment was down 6.3%, compared with a cumulative decline of less than half that during the early 1980s. Moreover, employment has recovered little following the trough, growing on net by less than two percentage points through late 2011. That’s about 10 percentage points below the growth path from the early 1980s recession. It is likely that the recent pattern of massive job losses and a weak jobs recovery is the primary explanation for elevated unemployment duration. The contribution of these elements can be examined more formally by performing a regression, a standard statistical technique for measuring the relationships among variable factors. We follow the approach of Aaronson et al. (2010), who calculate the extent to which rising duration can be explained by changes in characteristics of the workforce. We extend their approach by incorporating measures of cumulative employment losses. For each month of CPS data on individual unemployment duration, we calculate the percentage change in payroll employment relative to the pre-recession peak and include it as an explanatory variable in our statistical exercise. We use payroll employment for each individual’s state of residence for this calculation (see Valletta 2011). The data used are for periods covering the latest recession and its aftermath, and the corresponding periods from the early 1980s recession. These are matched by counting months forward from the pre-recession employment peak. The recent duration data are adjusted for the 1994 and 2011 changes in survey measurement. Read Why Is Unemployment Duration So Long? here .
  • The Takeaway: The State of Manufacturing

    With President Obama making a strong push for a "rebirth for manufacturing" in his State of the Union address, there has been a fair bit of chatter about whether manufacturers can make a comeback. This morning, our friends at The Takeaway had an interesting conversation with the head of a West Virginia company that makes marbles. Peter Morici, professor of international business at the University of Maryland, also joined the conversation. Take a listen:
  • FOMC January Meeting: Majority of Participants Project Target Interest Rate Hike At Least Two Years Off

    It looks as though interest rates will remain low for the next two years. At their January meeting, members of the Federal Open Market Committee not only kept the target federal funds rate between 0 and 1/4 percent, they, as a group, projected the next rate increase would likely not come until 2014 at the earliest. They also set the inflation target at 2%. Here is a look at the Fed's projections for GDP and unemployment: At his press conference following the meeting, Ben Bernanke noted that the Fed needs to remain open to measures to "provide further stimulus" if the pace of recovery slows: Read the FOMC January statement here .
  • Davidson: Declining Mobility and What it Says About Workers Skills and Industry in America

    Adam Davidson 's latest NYT Magazine column is a must read, and it highlights one of the topics we love to keep an eye on at The Watch: mobility. Historically, a high level of economic mobility in the U.S. has often meant a lot of geographic mobility. But today? Not so much interstate migration, as this NYT graphic shows: Davidson points out that mobility requires industries that are successful and creating jobs to pull people from one state to another. And the industries that have that pull today are looking for workers with particular skills. Part of the problem is that the country’s largest industries are in decline. In the past, it was perfectly clear where young people should go for work (Chicago in the 1870s, Detroit in the 1910s, Houston in the 1970s) and, more or less, what they’d be doing when they got there (killing steer, building cars, selling oil). And these industries were large enough to offer jobs to each class of worker, from unskilled laborer to manager or engineer. Today, the few bright spots in our economy are relatively small (though some promise future growth) and decentralized. There are great jobs in Silicon Valley, in the biotech research capitals of Boston and Raleigh-Durham and in advanced manufacturing plants along the southern I-85 corridor. These companies recruit all over the country and the globe for workers with specific abilities. (You don’t need to be the next Mark Zuckerberg to get a job in one of the microhubs, by the way. But you will almost certainly need at least a B.A. in computer science or a year or two at a technical school.) This newer, select job market is national, and it offers members of the mobile class competitive salaries and higher bargaining power. Many members of the immobile class, on the other hand, live in the America of the grim headlines. If you have no specialized skills, there’s little reason to uproot to another state and be the last in line for a low-paying job at a new auto plant or a burgeoning green-energy cluster. The surprise in the census data, however, is that the immobile work force is not limited to unskilled workers. In fact, many have a college degree. This column has sparked an ongoing online conversation at the Planet Money blog. Read Davidson's column here . And then go to responses from Brookings demographer William Frey , here , and Northwestern economist Joseph Ferrie, here .
  • Private Equity Explained

    There is a lot of political talk about the good and bad of private equity firms these days, but Paddy Hirsch steps away from the fray in this Marketplace Whiteboard to explain just what it is that private equity firms do: Private equity explained from Marketplace on Vimeo .
  • Unemployment Down to 8.5%

    The US economy added another 200,000 jobs in December, dropping the unemployment rate to 8.5 percent, according to the Department of Labor . This capped off a relatively strong end of 2011, as the unemployment rate has dropped by 0.6 since August. The US added 1.6 million jobs during 2011. Here's a look at the unemployment trends from the Bureau of Labor Statistics : Here are some of the key data from other areas we like to track in the monthly jobs report: The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) declined by 371,000 to 8.1 million in December. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. About 2.5 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force in December, little different from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. Among the marginally attached, there were 945,000 discouraged workers in December, a decrease of 373,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.6 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in December had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. Read the full report from the BLS here .
  • Atlas Van Lines Migration Report

    The Watch is in Michigan for a couple of days, where people seem a little surprised, and yet pleased to see one report that has migration away from the state leveling off. In Atlas Van Lines 's 2011 migration report, Michigan is listed as balanced state. Interstate moves to and from Michigan were even in 2011. The same was true for half the US states. There were very few states that qualified as inbound states over the year. Take a look at the Atlas migration map: We understand why elected officials in Michigan might point to this map as a good sign. After all, Michigan had been an outbound state for 6 years in a row. But the map shows there is simply a lot less mobility across the US. Read the report here .
  • Boston Globe's 12 for 2012: 6 Reasons for Optimism, 6 for Pessimism

    The first work week of 2012 is now underway. As we look ahead to the year ahead, the state of the economy is first on foremost on our minds. Boston Globe Correspondent Jay Fitzgerald offers up no predictions, but rather a point-counterpoint list of reasons to be optimistic, and reasons to be pessimistic, about the economy in 2012. The six reasons to be optimistic: Momentum --that is, 2011 ended with some; Jobs --improving data on that front; Corporate profits --slowed down in 2011, so maybe companies will need to hire in order to get the growth engine humming; Inflation --"remains in check"; Exports --the weak dollar is helping sales of US exports; and Technology --high-tech/scientific sectors remain strong. Before you get too excited, here are the reasons Fitzgerald sites for pessimism: Europe --the old continent starts off 2012 with a lot of uncertainty; The job market --improving, yes, but not quickly enough. Housing --a big problem far from solved; Politics --with an election this year, it is hard to imagine policymakers in Washington coming together on any bold fixes; Energy --oil is back near $100/barrel; and Banks --American banks are better off than their European counterparts, but that is not saying much. What is Fitzgerald's list missing? And do you see the factors on one list beating out those on the other? Read Will 2012 be the year for economic optimists? here .
  • Inc.: 'The 5 Hardest Jobs to Fill in 2012'

    Keith Cline , a "start-up headhunter" and founder of VentureFizz , is trumpeting start-ups in the tech sector as key drivers of economic growth in 2012. He thinks there will be jobs in the sector--maybe even more jobs than workers who are qualified for those particular jobs. So while the job-seekers to jobs ratio overall remains high and foreboding for most workers, Cline says top candidates in these five areas will have strong bargaining power: Software Engineers and Web Developers Creative Design and User Experience Product Management Marketing Analytics Read Cline's full analysis at Inc. , here .
  • Stiglitz's 'Alternative Theory of the Depression'

    In a thought-provoking piece for the January issue of Vanity Fair , Joseph Stiglitz urges us to consider an important element of the Great Depression that has not received as much attention in the media as monetary policy, a troubled banking system, or political battling. Stiglitz points us to the shift away from agriculture in the late 1920s through the early 1930s as cause of the Depression. If we are to look more closely at that piece of history, then we may be able to extract important lessons for today, as we see so many Americans going through revolutionary changes in their work and in their workplaces. Citing resebarch that he has been doing with Bruce Greenwald , Stiglitz writes: The parallels between the story of the origin of the Great Depression and that of our Long Slump are strong. Back then we were moving from agriculture to manufacturing. Today we are moving from manufacturing to a service economy. The decline in manufacturing jobs has been dramatic—from about a third of the workforce 60 years ago to less than a tenth of it today. The pace has quickened markedly during the past decade. There are two reasons for the decline. One is greater productivity—the same dynamic that revolutionized agriculture and forced a majority of American farmers to look for work elsewhere. The other is globalization, which has sent millions of jobs overseas, to low-wage countries or those that have been investing more in infrastructure or technology. (As Greenwald has pointed out, most of the job loss in the 1990s was related to productivity increases, not to globalization.) Whatever the specific cause, the inevitable result is precisely the same as it was 80 years ago: a decline in income and jobs. The millions of jobless former factory workers once employed in cities such as Youngstown and Birmingham and Gary and Detroit are the modern-day equivalent of the Depression’s doomed farmers. The consequences for consumer spending, and for the fundamental health of the economy—not to mention the appalling human cost—are obvious, though we were able to ignore them for a while. For a time, the bubbles in the housing and lending markets concealed the problem by creating artificial demand, which in turn created jobs in the financial sector and in construction and elsewhere. The bubble even made workers forget that their incomes were declining. They savored the possibility of wealth beyond their dreams, as the value of their houses soared and the value of their pensions, invested in the stock market, seemed to be doing likewise. But the jobs were temporary, fueled on vapor. Mainstream macro-economists argue that the true bogeyman in a downturn is not falling wages but rigid wages—if only wages were more flexible (that is, lower), downturns would correct themselves! But this wasn’t true during the Depression, and it isn’t true now. On the contrary, lower wages and incomes would simply reduce demand, weakening the economy further. Of four major service sectors—finance, real estate, health, and education—the first two were bloated before the current crisis set in. The other two, health and education, have traditionally received heavy government support. But government austerity at every level—that is, the slashing of budgets in the face of recession—has hit education especially hard, just as it has decimated the government sector as a whole. Nearly 700,000 state- and local-government jobs have disappeared during the past four years, mirroring what happened in the Depression. As in 1937, deficit hawks today call for balanced budgets and more and more cutbacks. Instead of pushing forward a structural transition that is inevitable—instead of investing in the right kinds of human capital, technology, and infrastructure, which will eventually pull us where we need to be—the government is holding back. Current strategies can have only one outcome: they will ensure that the Long Slump will be longer and deeper than it ever needed to be. Read The Book of Jobs here .
  • NFIB Small Business Index Continued to Inch Upward in November

    There was a rise in optimism among small business owners in November, according to a National Federation of Independent Business survey. The NFIB's optimism index rose to 92.1, from 90.2 in October, spurred largely by perceptions among small business owners that labor conditions are improving. Here's a look at the long term trend: While the uptick is certainly a nice change from the end of the summer, when the index was down at 88.1, NFIB economists William Dunkelberg and Holly Wade do not exude optimism in their report. After all, they point out, the index is still 2 points lower than it was at the beginning of the year. The economy is slowly righting itself, dealing with a huge excess supply of assets created in the 2003-2007 boom and the associated debt incurred to create those assets and take consumption to a record high share of GDP (the “party”). The 2000 stock crash left winners with cash and losers with worthless shares of lostmoney.com. We moved on, winners and losers declared. The housing bubble crash left a different set of assets for us to deal with. Declaring, even finding, winners and losers is a mess, not the least due to government trying to determine the outcomes. Not worthless pieces of paper but millions of houses, apartments, condos and less often discussed, retail stores, strip malls, restaurants and the like and a pile of inventory to get rid of. This process is difficult and protracted. In 2007, 845,000 new firms were formed (displacing 804,000 existing firms). This process went into reverse in 2008. More firms terminated, fewer started, fewer new homes were built, inventory went on sale to raise cash and employment was slashed as the now surplus of firms struggled to survive. Many of these sought loans to “tide them over”, loans that by now would in most instances have gone bad had they been made. The adjustment seems to be about over. Historically high percentages of owners report inventories are in balance, reduced to match anemic consumer spending. However few plan to add to stocks as prospects for improved growth have not been optimistic. Firms have stopped firing workers, employment has adjusted to weaker sales, but hiring new workers remains muted, as sales prospects offer little reason to hire more workers. Most equipment is still working requiring little need to buy new stuff. Still a problem is the number of firms competing for reduced levels of consumer spending, experiencing poor financial performance. There is likely more to come here, more terminations. This will increase sales at the remaining firms and with a boost from modestly improving consumer spending, begin to address the unemployment problem a bit more aggressively. The excess supply of structures will continue to be a drag, but less so. Read the full report here .
  • November Jobs Report: Unemployment Rate Drops to 8.6%

    The unemployment rate dropped to 8.6 percent as the US economy added 120,000 jobs in November, according to the latest numbers released by the Department of Labor . With 50,000 jobs added, the retail trade sector helped push job growth, The professional and business services , health care and leisure and hospitality sectors all had job growth during November. With 5,000 US Postal Service workers losing their jobs in November, government employment continued to decline. Here's a look at the unemployment trends from the Bureau of Labor Statistics : Here are some of the key data from other areas we like to track in the monthly jobs report: The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) dropped by 378,000 over the month to 8.5 million. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full- time job. In November, 2.6 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, about the same as a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. Among the marginally attached, there were 1.1 million discouraged workers in November, a decrease of 186,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.5 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in November had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. Read the full report from the BLS here .
1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »