Federal Regulations and the Need for Better Cost/Benefit Analysis

KnowNOW!

Global Economic Watch

Syndication

Recent Posts

Tags

Archives

Michael Greenstone finds the debate between proponents and opponents of government regulation "tired."  Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project at The Brookings Institution.  Greenstone argues that regulation has both costs and benefits.  What we need to do, he says, is to come up with better ways of measuring which regulations work.  And by work, he means simply that the benefits of the regulations outweighs the costs those regulations place on business.  He discusses the need to better evaluate potential regulations, across federal agencies, in this @Brookings interview:


Posted 07-07-2011 8:27 AM by Graham Griffith
You must login to your account to comment. If you do not have an account, please register to enjoy the full benefits of the site!