As members of Congress head home for August recess, you can be sure they will be talking almost non-stop with constitutents about health care reform efforts. And they are likely to run into some small business owners who are not fond of House Resolution 3200--or "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009." The National Federation of Independent Businesses--a powerful advocacy group that has not exactly been fond of the Obama Administration's economic policies thus far--is pushing back against the legislation, and lists these ten reasons it is bad for small businesses:
1. An Employer Mandate
2. Payroll Tax Penalty
3. Pay-or-Play, Pay-and-Pay
and Offer-and-Pay
4. A Mandated Minimum Plan
with a Big Price Tag
5. An Exchange that Limits
Access to All Small Businesses
6. An All Powerful Insurance
Czar
7. The Government-Run Public
Option
8. The Surtax: A Tax on Job
Creation
9. Jeopardizes Options That
Small Employers Have Today
10. An Employer Tax Credit with Limited
Value
Click here to read explanations for each item.
Still, the White House continues to stress that the bill is a new positive for small businesses. the Council of Economic Advisers has released a study: The Economic Effects of Health Care Reform on Small Businesses and their Employees. CEA Chair Christina Romer writes that under the current system, the small businesses that do offer health care do so at a much greater cost to the business and the employees:
Put simply, the current U.S. health care system imposes a heavy tax on small businesses and their employees. Those small firms that do offer coverage have to pay a higher cost than their larger competitors. To the degree that higher costs are passed on to workers, small firms pay lower take-home wages to their employees. Those small firms that do not offer coverage have employees who do not receive the substantial tax benefits of employer-provided health insurance that their counterparts at large firms enjoy. These employees are more likely to purchase policies in the individual market, where they pay much higher rates. In either case, small firms are likely to be at a competitive disadvantage in the market for hiring workers. Small firms are likely to have a more difficult time than larger firms recruiting potential employees who do not have health insurance from another source. Even if a small firm provides the best fit for a worker’s skills and interests, the individual may choose not to work there given the implicit tax.

Read the full report here.